Chapter 7 begins with fostering language awareness from two
popular countries, the USA and Britain. Although
both countries brought important points within the idea of LA, I was
especially drawn to the Whole language movement because it advocates the
acceptance of the different dialects of L1 as well as L2 students bring with
them. In every country, there are negative stigmas attach with dialects that
are not considered proper such as AVE or Chicano English in the USA. I cannot
cease to repeat the fact that students need to be taught that certain context
demand for certain dialects and one needs to know which dialect or variety to
use to benefits them. Students also need to understand that although all
language variety are entitled to equal power, there are some dialects that over
power others and understand that
language is linked to power, Kumar calls this critical language
awareness. It is very important for students to understand how language is use
within their country and be aware of social inequalities and dominance that can
result from language. Such type of teaching must come from a teacher who
possesses an awareness of language. The example of doublespeak to foster
language awareness was a great example to use to teach students the power of
language. Even native speakers are easily drawn to such traps. In order to
provide such language awareness teachers need to be knowledgeable both within
and outside their field. Kumar mentioned that teacher’s “limited knowledge of
language may result in a failure to anticipate learners’ learning problems
etc.” (162). This is very important because when a teacher knows the content
which he or she is teaching, they can imagine what can go wrong and where it
can go wrong and have the appropriate explanation to facilitate such confusion.
The second part of the reading
proposed the idea of activating students’ intuitive heuristics which is closely
linked to the concept of fostering language awareness. If a student is able to
learn by discovering things by themselves then they are able to increase their
awareness of the language. Creating an
environment that allows students to activate their intuitive heuristics and
discover for themselves is a hard task a teacher must do. Knowing that as a
teacher, it is my duty to create such environment
makes me paranoid because I feel that I might fail or might let an opportunity
to create such environment slip away like the teacher in episode 8.1 (Kumar
179). The chapter goes on to talk about
two different types teaching methods, inductive teaching and intuitive
heuristics. I was glad to see that the chapter offered both sides of inductive
teaching method which I agree with them. This type of teaching styles work well
with adults so they can use it to analyze the rules, also as an adult Spanish learner
I would like this method. But on the
other hand, learners need to learn how to hypothesize about language and make
certain conclusion without the teacher explicitly telling them. I believe when
one does this he or she is capable of learning, remembering, and applying what
he or she has learned. As I was reading the chapter, I was searching for the
author to provide some negative aspects or disadvantage to intuitive heuristics
method to point out to teachers that both methods offer good and bad effects
and it was up to the teacher to determine which to choose to better fit their
classroom.
No comments:
Post a Comment