This week’s reading brought back many related topics that
have been discussed in class. It
reminded me that just as there is not best method to teaching a language, there
is also no best method to teaching writing, as the article by Ferris mentioned,
“no error correction method will ever be effective enough to reach the 100
percent standard” (95). Also, when it
comes to methods about learning a language, we have this false preconceive notion
that by sifting through various methods we will eventually arrive to the
perfect one, this same thinking can be seen in learning how to write. “ Writing
teachers tend to focus obsessively on finding the right lessons in the attempt
to find the magic bullet that will get students to that elusive Point B” (Ferris
108). As teachers, we must distance ourselves from this type of thinking
because the variables associated with learning the different form of language
(speaking, writing, listening and reading) are simply “to complex, too messy, for
any one method or approach to be universally successful” ( Ferris 95). Another great reminder within the Ferris’
article is the importance of feedback and the treatment of global versus local
errors. It is only when feedback, whether writing or spoken, is “thoughtful and
consistently delivered” can it be beneficial to the students. Rather than focusing on such unrealistic
goals, teachers should focus on providing effective and long lasting strategies
to help L2 learners with reading and writing. Between the article and Brown’s
chapters, both authors provided strategies that teachers could implement in
their classroom.
Among the authors, there is a strong importance given to the
topic of authentic and meaningful classroom activities and materials. As
teacher, we must always strive to relate what is being taught in the classroom to
the outside world. One strategic that Brown mentions is that the purpose of a
reading assignment must be identify. This same thinking can be applied to
writing. I believe teachers are good at
performing this task when it comes to writing but not so much with reading. It
is difficult reading a text when the purpose has not been identified. This causes
confusion as to what the reader should retain and what they should not. I witness this first hand with the reading
materials from the class. It is beneficial when an article has an introduction
that bluntly identifies its purpose. This is also helpful for me because at the
end of the reading, I can refer back to the identify purpose to determine if
the author meet his/her objectives. This
same strategy can help L2 learners in becoming better readers and writers. Another reading strategy that I believed useful
is the strategy of guessing the meaning of the words or sentence while reading.
Teachers should teach students to make intelligent guesses. While learning
Spanish, I relied heavily on this strategy to help me read text in a timely
manner. As a self-check process, once I guessed the meaning of a word I would
continue reading and while I read, I reflected on the word I guessed, shaping
and reshaping my original definition until I arrived to an intelligent
one. This is the type of strategy we
must teach our future students, to developed that self-editing tool. I also found the reading strategy, “we much
teach students to take time to write”, to be important and applicable to all
students (Ferris 98). Often we, students, tend to wait the last minute to
complete a written assignment. In her article, Ferris notes that it is helpful
for teachers to design assignment in a structure that forces students out of
procrastination. I wish this strategy could be employed by my college professors.
I really enjoyed reading the article because not only did it mention the strategies, it also provided real life examples for teachers to follow. At the end of the day, teachers can not invent the perfect method (otherwise it would have been done centuries ago) , rather we must provide student with different long lasting strategies they can employ and help them developed a self-editing tool to better their reading and writing skills.
No comments:
Post a Comment